<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online News And Teens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediasnackers.com/2009/04/online-news-and-teens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediasnackers.com/2009/04/online-news-and-teens/</link>
	<description>We inspire people to learn, work &#38; live differently with social media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mapstone</title>
		<link>http://mediasnackers.com/2009/04/online-news-and-teens/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mapstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediasnackers.com/?p=4839#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>What strikes me about the report is how suddenly obvious it is to present better news sites, rather than news &#039;for kids&#039;. Regarding what&#039;s currently being offered, you only have to look at the quote &#039;(news) simply doesn’t fit their needs&#039; - nothing to do with the content. It&#039;s a matter of time availability and lifestyle.

I&#039;ve personally cringed at some TV programmes attempts to dumb down the news for young people. I&#039;m sure it may hit a certain demographic, but at the risk of alienating and patronising many others.

So I welcome this report and hope more people read it and understand the young peoples responses - they want news yes, but in a manageable format and presentation style.

You don&#039;t have to be young to want that - its the reason I stopped buying broadsheet newspapers, and its one of the reasons why broadsheets adopted the tabloid style of publication.

Perhaps the news should take a leaf out of the 140 character Twitter model - less is more - more thought into the wording, and a more accessible size reaching many, many more people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strikes me about the report is how suddenly obvious it is to present better news sites, rather than news &#8216;for kids&#8217;. Regarding what&#8217;s currently being offered, you only have to look at the quote &#8216;(news) simply doesn’t fit their needs&#8217; &#8211; nothing to do with the content. It&#8217;s a matter of time availability and lifestyle.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve personally cringed at some TV programmes attempts to dumb down the news for young people. I&#8217;m sure it may hit a certain demographic, but at the risk of alienating and patronising many others.</p>
<p>So I welcome this report and hope more people read it and understand the young peoples responses &#8211; they want news yes, but in a manageable format and presentation style.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be young to want that &#8211; its the reason I stopped buying broadsheet newspapers, and its one of the reasons why broadsheets adopted the tabloid style of publication.</p>
<p>Perhaps the news should take a leaf out of the 140 character Twitter model &#8211; less is more &#8211; more thought into the wording, and a more accessible size reaching many, many more people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

